Tuesday 31 January 2012

A Riggindale Horseshoe

Riggindale Horseshoe
A long round which commences with the delighful climb of Long Stile. This walk takes in five Wainwrights: High Street, The Knott, Rampsgill Head, High Raise and Kidsty Pike.
Start / End: car park at Mardale Head.
Time: 5 to 6 hours.

Riggindale Horseshoe map


Haweswater and Harter Fell
Looking back to the start of the walk from the path alongside Haweswater reservoir.  Cars parked at Mardale Head visible to the left of the photo.  Looming above is Harter Fell.

Haweswater from Long Stile
A view along Haweswater from a shoulder near the foot of the Long Stile ridge.

Long Stile ridge towards High Street
Reverse direction from the previous photograph, looking up the ridge towards High Street.


Rampsgill Head from Long Stile
Rampsgill Head from a mid point on Long Stile.


Long Stile, High Street
The upper section of the ridge, which is steep in places but never a scramble.


High Street from The Knott
View south from The Knott.  The mountain in cloud is High Street.

Eastern Fells from Rampsgill Head
View to the west from the ridge between Rampsgill Head and High Raise.  The prominent central peak is Catstycam, with clouds brushing the summits of Helvellyn and Nethermost Pike.

High Street from Kidsty Pike
High Street from Kidsty Pike.


Haweswater and The Rigg
Descending from Kidsty Pike.  Haweswater and the Rigg are in view to the right.


Riggindale and Eagle Crag
Riggindale, with Kidsty Pike in sunshine.  Eagle Crag, home to England's last golden eagle - a solitary male - is in shadow to the left.


Haweswater
Completion of the walk on the shoreline path along Haweswater.

Route ideas and information are from the Wainwright walking guides:











Monday 30 January 2012

A Helvellyn Horseshoe

Helvellyn horseshoe
A long but thoroughly enjoyable circular walk which takes in five Wainwrights: Dollywaggon Pike, Nethermost Pike, Helvellyn, Whiteside and Raise.  
Start / End: Glenridding or Patterdale.
Time: 5 to 7 hours.   

Helvellyn round map


Grisedale
Looking up Grisedale near the start of the walk.  Dollywaggon Pike is slightly to the left of centre, its east ridge prominent.

Grisedale Ruthwaite Lodge
The view back down Grisedale from the foot of Dollywaggon Pike's East Ridge.  Ruthwaite Lodge Climbing Hut can be seen to the right of centre.

Dollywaggon
Nearing the summit of Dollwaggon Pike.


View from Dollywaggon Pike East Ridge
Looking back down the ridge.  Ullswater peeps out to the left of Place Fell in the centre distance.  St. Sunday Crag to the right.  The far left hand ridge is the flank of Birkhouse Moor, leading onto Striding Edge.

Central Lake District Fells
The fells of the central Lakes in the distance, as seen from the path between Dollwaggon and Nethermost Pikes.


Striding Edge, Helvellyn
A sunlit Striding Edge from the summit of Nethermost Pike.  Catstycam in shadow.


Helvellyn and Red Tarn
Helvellyn summit.  Red Tarn below.  The High Street range in the far distance.

Nethermost and Dollywaggon Pikes from Helvellyn
From the summit of Helvellyn, looking south over Nethermost Pike, Dollwaggon Pike and Windermere towards Morecambe Bay.

Whiteside and Helvellyn from Raise
The view back over Whiteside and Helvellyn Lower Man towards Helvellyn (far left) from Raise.


Catstycam and Helvellyn above Brown Cove
Descending the zig-zags on the south flank of Raise.  The bowl of Brown Cove is prominent between Catstycam (left), Helvellyn (centre) and Lower Man (right).



Road to Glenridding
A final glimpse towards the fells from the road leading back to Glenridding.   

Route ideas and information are taken from Wainwright's excellent walking guides:

Thursday 12 January 2012

MONTANE MINIMUS waterproof jacket review

MONTANE MINIMUS REVIEW

 

Montane Minimus

  
Features.
The Montane Minimus is an ultra-lightweight waterproof jacket, weighing just 215 grams.  It features a roll-away hood with volume adjuster and front drawcords, a water-resistant front zip with an internal storm-flap, hem drawcord adjusters, a mesh ventilated single chest pocket, some reflective piping and a small stuff sack.  And not a lot else. It's available in bright red, vivid green (with red zips) and black.

Montane Minimus pocket
Mesh-lined chest pocket is large enough to take a map.

Montane Minimus hood
Wired peak, adjustable drawcords that don't whip into the face when it's windy, internal storm-flap, velour-lined chin guard.   


Why an ultra-lightweight waterproof?
For years, when going into the fells, the Fellwalk team have all dutifully stuffed waterproof jacket and trousers into our rucksacks, just in case the forecasters got it wrong; as we prefer to walk in decent weather, we tend to pick those days when the forecasters promise sunshine.  And during many of our walks, the waterproofs stayed in the rucksack, making us grateful for the skill of our weather forecasters.  The thing is, weighed together, a typical waterproof jacket and trousers combination can tip the scales at almost 1.5 kg - that's a lot of weight being needlessly carried on a warm summer's afternoon.  It eventually dawned on us that we could enjoy our walks more, travelling further and faster, if we carried less. Yes, we're a bit slow on the uptake.  We didn't want to ditch the waterproofs entirely, as the forecasters aren't always right, and so we started looking for an ultra-lightweight set of waterproofs for those days when it probably wouldn't rain, but might.  Our criteria for the jacket were;
  • weight of less than 250 grams
  • wired hood with drawcord volume adjustment (we can't get along with those velcro-tab adjusters)
  • hand pockets
  • pit zips
  • full-length front zip
  • price of less than £100
A tall order!  After several months of studying the options available, we could find no jacket that satisfied all the criteria: the closest we found was the Marmot Super Micah, which looked fine on everything except price, something we weren't prepared to compromise much on for a jacket that was to spend most of its days in the rucksack (hopefully).  The Montane Minimus, however could be got for a price of around £100 (see the ad at the foot of the page), and satisfied most of the criteria.  Also, the claimed breathability of the Pertex Shield fabric (25,000 MVTR - that's high, apparently) meant that maybe we wouldn't need those pit zips.  And hand pockets wouldn't be much use in rain anyway, as the water would get in.  So we chose the Minimus.

On test.
On its first couple of trips, the Minimus stayed in its stuff sack, apple-sized (a largish apple, but one that would easily compress down more) taking up little room in the bottom of a rucksack, and for this, and for the fact the rucksack seemed to be virtually weightless, we were exceedingly glad.  Its first test came on the furthest reaches of the Kentmere horseshoe,  traversing Thornthwaite Crag.  The wind got up, large splodges of rain spattered down, and before long we were walking straight into driving sleet; had we known we'd be facing weather like this, we'd have packed the old, heavy, reassuring waterproofs.  But we needn't have been concerned.  The Minimus kept our tester completely dry, other than on the face - turning the face away from the wind helped; thankfully, the volume adjuster worked a treat and the hood remained firmly in place with any head movement.  And the high breathability of the jacket surprised us, with no condensation inside at the end of the walk, despite the increase in temperature as we descended to the car.  Who needs pit zips anyway?

Summary.
The Minimus has done everything asked of it so far, on day walks in the Lakes and North Wales.  When it's been needed, it has kept the rain out; when it hasn't been needed, its weight hasn't been a burden in the bottom of the pack. It has all the features you need and nothing you don't, and has quickly become the waterproof jacket of choice for all hillwalks other than on the murkiest winter days.  Despite our initial misgivings about its ability to keep the elements out (the material is so thin) we wouldn't hesitate to pack it for extended, two- or three- (or more) day walks / treks.  No doubt the fabric will wear quickly relative to the heavier, thicker fabric found on a more conventional jacket, but as the weather is always going to remain dry on our future walks, maybe it won't get the chance! 

Score: 9/10.

Pros:
  • very light weight;
  • excellent hood;
  • highly breathable fabric.

Cons:
  • We'd still like hand pockets, to help warm the hands on those drier days when we'll use the Mimimus as a wind jacket;
  • How long will it last? 
With an RRP of £140, the Minimus tends to retail at around £120. You can get yours for less than that, here:


The competition.
Other ultra-lightweights we considered are:

The North Face Triumph
Ultra-light, but a smock rather than a jacket, which limits its venting options.  Also, we have misgivings about the floppy peaks on TNF's hoods - they don't stand up well to typically British blustery weather, tending to throw rain into your face when the breeze gets up.  Quite expensive and difficult to find.

Marmot Super Micah
All the features we could want in a a lightweight waterproof, but it's quite pricey and hard to get hold of.  We've also read some negative reports about the fabric, which isn't as breathable as that used in the Mimimus.  On the plus side, the fabric is reinforced in places, to reduce wear from your rucksack.



Berghaus Elite half-zip
Very lightweight, but a smock rather than a jacket, again limiting venting options.  Also, the fabric is not particularly breathable, so we imagine it would be uncomfortable on a muggy, wet day.

Go-Lite Malpais Trinity
Very light, full zip, hand pockets, available at discounted prices.  we've read horror stories about the hood though, and the fabric isn't as breathable as that used on the Mimimus.

OSPREY KESTREL 48 rucksack review

OSPREY KESTREL 48 review
Osprey Kestrel 48 rucksack, Paddington Bear and Machu Picchu
Big enough for a bear.

Features.
The Kestrel 48 is a well-featured backpack that boasts an external hydration pocket, separate internal compartments, a waterproof cover, side compression straps, an 'airscape' back-panel and Osprey's patented 'Stow on the Go' trekking pole attachment system.  What more could you want?

Why buy a 48 litre rucksack?
45 to 50 litres is ample for carrying a lightweight tent and sleeping bag, mat and spare clothing, but not so big as to encourage you to pack things you don't need.  Therefore, this pack is a good size for overnight hiking / camping trips or longer, although for real long-distance trekking where you'd be carrying cooking gear, food and extra clothing, you'd probably want something more roomy.  One of our reasons for choosing the Kestrel was the Stow on the Go pole attachment system, more of which later.  

On test.
We tested this pack on two- to five-day camping treks  in the Lake District, Peru and the Japanese Alps.

Pros:
  • The back is adjustable, allowing modification to be made for the height of the user.  Adjustment is simple, made via a velcro flap in an external sleeve.
  • The water pouch pocket is external, meaning that you don't have to unpack the sack to refill, and has a loop to attach to the water pouch to keep it upright.
  • Drinking tube attachments on the the straps are, unlike those found on many sacks, elasticated and large enough to actually fit the nozzle through.
  • Three stretchy mesh pockets are provided, which are great for storing things you could need in a hurry (waterproofs, water bottles).
  • Side compression straps are effective.
  • The Stow on the Go trekking pole carrying system is useful (although not quite as easy to use as it could be).
  • We rather like the look of the rucksack, and the built in waterproof cover is useful in wet weather.

Osprey Kestrel 48 pockets
Large waist-belt pockets are the perfect size for a chocolate bar or two.

Cons:
  • When fully laden, this pack is uncomfortable.  Despite making numerous adjustments to back length and the shoulder straps, we still suffered from painful cramps in the shoulders on the first two or three days of any walk.  You might expect this to some extent from any heavily laden pack, but we've never suffered with other packs like we've suffered with this.  Maybe it's just not a great fit for us, but we think the back / shoulder carrying system is more suited to a daypack; it's simply too insubstantial and lacks the padding you'd expect on a larger capacity rucksack. We suspect the system would work just fine on the smaller Kestrel 38.
  • It's heavy; nearly 2 kilograms unladen.
  • It's fussy: on the hipbelt it has ridiculously over-length straps which unravel from their holsters and dangle; three pockets on the lid is just overkill, straps seem to dangle everywhere and need chopping to length.
  • The shoulder strap adjusters on our Kestrel slip, requiring frequent adjustment.
  • One of the side compression straps on our rucksack was assembled back to front, meaning that the strap is twisted.  The compression strap still works, but we expected better quality of construction for the price.
  • The 'airscape' back system does little to promote the flow of cool air, which invariably results in a sweaty back. 
  • The downside to the water-pouch carrier is that, sitting as it does between the internal compartment and the 'airscape' pad, it tends to deform the latter, which can result in an uncomfortable carry (a partial solution is to ensure that air is squeezed out of the water pouch before you close it and insert it into the pack).

Osprey Kestrel 48
Ridiculously long waist-belt straps held in place - for now, but not for long - by an elasticated strap. 

Osprey
Those slippery shoulder strap adjusters.  The H2O symbol shows where the water pouch can be fitted between the airscape panel and the exterior of the pack.  The clip for the water pouch is a well designed feature. 


Conclusions.
Had this rucksack been comfortable to carry we could have forgiven its weight and over-fussy design.  However, when it's heavily-laden, we've come to dread wearing it.  The shoulder straps and back system are just not padded enough for a rucksack of this capacity.  Because of this, we suggest you shop around before opting for the Kestrel 48.

Score: 6/10  

For a range of alternative sacks (most of which we haven't yet tested) try Amazon Rucksacks